|
SubscriptionsSites I Read
|
|
|
|
| * Opinion poll shows big swing against Pakistani Taliban * Overwhelmingly negative views of U.S., Obama also seen * Pakistanis express opposition to the war in Afghanistan Some interesting news out of Pakistan, both good and bad. The good bit, is obviously that public opinion, as far as this new poll conducted by WorldPublicOpinion.org shows that up to 81 percent of Pakistani people view Islamist militants and local Taliban as a critical threat to the country, up from 34 percent in 2007. That's a tremendous increase, if accurate. If coupled with the fact that the poll also shows widespread sympathy with the present government and support for the army, this could mean that Pakistan can now begin to really hit the Taliban and other radicals where it hurts, without worrying about alienating the public. Meanwhile, the country that has given them billions of dollars and continues to promise plenty more, is still the target of widespread disdain (to say the least.) Pakistanis are still not fond of their American allies, but that doesn't matter as much, as long as they realise that the local militants are the ones that really matter and need to be beaten. Posted via web from Rohan's posterous | | |
| Interesting experiment into our natural tendency to be cruel. "Last year Karla Hoff, an economist at the World Bank who is currently working at Princeton University, and her colleagues reported the results of experiments conducted in villages in the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh (American Economic Review, vol 98, p 494). In these tests, two players started out with 50 rupees each. The first could choose to give his to the second, in which case the experimenters added a further 100 rupees, giving the second player 200 rupees in total. The second player could decide to keep the money for himself, or share it equally with the first player. A third player then entered the game, who could punish the second player - for each 2 rupees he was willing to spend, the second player was docked 10 rupees. The results were startling. Even when the second player shared the money fairly, two-thirds of the time the newcomer decided to punish him anyway - a spiteful act with seemingly no altruistic payoff. "We asked one guy why," says Hoff. "He said he thought it was fun."" Posted via web from Rohan's posterous | | |
| "It's the stuff of which military novels are written."
So says renowned journalist Bob Woodward (one of the dynamic Watergate duo), about some new secret American technique that they're using in their counter-terrorism effort.
From CBS, via The Acorn
Woodward reports, for the first time, that there is a secret behind the success of the surge: a sophisticated and lethal special operations program. “This is very sensitive and very top secret, but there are secret operational capabilities that have been developed by the military to locate, target, and kill leaders of al Qaeda in Iraq, insurgent leaders, renegade militia leaders. That is one of the true breakthroughs,” Woodward told Pelley. “But what are we talking about here? It’s some kind of surveillance? Some kind of targeted way of taking out just the people that you’re looking for? The leadership of the enemy?” Pelley asked. “I’d love to go through the details, but I’m not going to,” Woodward replied. … “Do you mean to say that this special capability is such an advance in military technique and technology that it reminds you of the advent of the tank and the airplane?” Pelley asked. “Yeah,” Woodward said. “If you were an al Qaeda leader or part of the insurgency in Iraq, or one of these renegade militias, and you knew about what they were able to do, you’d get your ass outta town.” | | |
| It's quite amazing, if I give myself the time to think about it, that I just attended a class with a former Chief Political Correspondent of the New York Times (and grinned when he quite frankly declared, on behalf of most in the media, that "we hate the Republicans, and they hate our guts.")
And then listened to a couple of professors who are close friends with such personalities as Barry Diller (responsible for the 'Killer Dillers') , Joan Rivers, Hunter Thompson and so on.
All the while sitting in a class with a few people that are undoubtedly going to be in the NFL in a few years.
This after living in sleepy, little Doha all my life. (And then if I let myself think about it, living in Doha could be considered by many to be as remarkable as those things.)
As an aside, I'd like to appreciate the tremendous job that Dana Perino has to do. My, I wouldn't appreciate having to be the 'face' of this administration. | | |
|
|